Feature: chaining
See original GitHub issueIt would be awesome to be able to do this:
request(app)
.get('/signin')
.expect(200)
.post('/signin')
.send({ user: 'foo', pass: 'bar' })
.expect(200)
// ...etc...
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 11 years ago
- Comments:18 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Feature Chaining — GeoServer 2.21.x User Manual
This page describes the use of “Feature Chaining” to compose complex features from simpler components, and in particular to address some requirements that ......
Read more >Feature Chaining Mapping | API4INSPIRE
Feature Chaining allows one to configure the mapping for each individual featureType or dataType separately within a FeatureTypeMapping section of the ...
Read more >Optional chaining (?.) - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs - Mozilla
The optional chaining (?.) operator accesses an object's property or calls a function. If the object accessed or function called is ...
Read more >[Feature] Chaining function and methods #19545 - GitHub
Hi there PW team! I would like to suggest adding an option to chain the functions/methods like in the Syntax of the TestCafe...
Read more >Activation Dependencies and Feature Stapling - Catapult
Feature stapling allows you to associate a feature with a site definition so that when a site based on a ... Complex feature...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Has there been any improvement regarding chaining? I’m having a similar code than @tj and I think it would be useful to be able to chain requests if you need to do several of them without needed to check for failure for each of them but instead doing so globally… 😕
@stereosteve This is a quick hack, but to get cookie support you can do something like this: