can't run Kolibri 0.8 on Ubuntu 16.04 with Python 3
See original GitHub issueObserved behavior
When installing 0.8 kolibri whl file on Ubuntu 16.04 with Python 3, users can’t run kolibri because it will exit with an error.
Expected behavior
Users can run kolibri successfully
User-facing consequences
If users install kolibri on Ubuntu using debian installers (from PPA or .deb) or through whl file with Python 3, they will not able to run Kolibri.
Errors and logs
Steps to reproduce
- Download kolibri 0.8.0-beta1 whl file on Ubuntu 16.04
- run pip3 install kolibri-0.8.0-beta1.whl
- run kolibri start
Context
Kolibri version: 0.8.0-beta1 Operating system: Ubuntu 16.04
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Debian/Ubuntu — Kolibri User Guide - Read the Docs
Download the latest .deb installer for Kolibri version 0.15, or have it copied to your local drive. · Run this command from the...
Read more >Manually verify import content on database file - Kolibri
I have seen some disk “sqlite3.DatabaseError: database disk image is malformed” errors on kolibri installations. Is there a way to repair or run...
Read more >"Your python3 install is corrupted" - Ask Ubuntu
Save this answer. Basically the solution to this problem consists of making /usr/bin/python point to the right version of Python your Ubuntu ......
Read more >How To Install Python 3 and Set Up a Local Programming ...
This tutorial will guide you through installing Python 3 on your local Linux machine and setting up a programming environment via the command ......
Read more >Installation | mediapipe - Google
Note: To make Mediapipe work with TensorFlow, please set Python 3.7 as the default Python version and install the Python “six” library by...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@benjaoming Then I will create a pull request to add back the 64 bit Linux c extensions.
@lyw07 I think so! I have no reason to believe that we added more space-requiring dependencies since last 😃