force-publish doesn't work as expected
See original GitHub issuehttps://github.com/lerna/lerna/tree/master#--force-publish-packages
This will skip the
lerna updated
check for changed packages and forces a package that didn’t have agit diff
change to be updated.
When I use --force-publish
Lerna adds all lerna updated
packages to the package I chose.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:7 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
asp.net - 'Publish failed' but build succeeded? - Stack Overflow
I had to copy project to C:\a\ and than publish. I suspect problems with long path. Strange, but worked for me.
Read more >Force 'dotnet publish' to publish dependencies using ...
There are two workarounds: 1) Edit the project file (csproj) for your web project and add an msbuild property for ...
Read more >How to Publish an Updated Version of an npm Package
Here is my understanding of the steps that are most commonly expected to be run when publishing a new version of an npm...
Read more >Publishing failed. You are probably offline & No ... - YouTube
We understand it can be really frustrating when the site doesn't work as it should have. As we were working on a site...
Read more >The 'Publish Project' button does nothing anymore
What I expected to happen: Open the publish dialog and let me select the publish profile like VS2015 does. I cannot see any...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Hi,
Our project has several dozens of loosely coupled packages. It would be a pity to have to update the version of each and every package of the repo everytime one of them changes slightly - this tends to happen several times everyday. On 2.x.x, we just specify a scope and this fits our need well, but I understand that if we update this would no longer be possible.
What would the right approach be in our case?
Ok I understand, maybe we could add an option that does that? I’m not the only one to request this and it is true that often when I publish a patch version it is not necessary to publish a patch version in all that depends on it.