publish with canary makes weird version.
See original GitHub issueExpected Behavior
My current version is 0.5.0. and I pre-released the next tags by running below.
lerna publish --canary --preid next --pre-dist-tag next --yes
Current Behavior
This command made new canary version successfully. But created version is different with what is expect.
I expect it generate 0.5.0-next.0
. But It generated 0.0.39-next.1
.
I cannot understand where 0.0.39
come from…
Is it bug? or is there my mistake?
lerna.json
{
"packages": [
"packages/*"
],
"version": "independent",
"npmClient": "yarn",
"useWorkspaces": true,
"command": {
"publish": {
"conventionalCommits": true
}
}
}
Your Environment
Executable | Version |
---|---|
lerna --version |
3.22.1 |
yarn --version |
1.22.10 |
node --version |
12.18 |
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5
Top Results From Across the Web
lerna publish --canary yields unpredicted version number #2622
All of a sudden we noticed that when publishing canary releases (triggers after merging a PR to main branch), the canary version number...
Read more >What Is Canary Deployment? - Semaphore CI
Many projects use an odd/even numbering scheme to separate stable from the non-stable version. Often companies publish canary versions of ...
Read more >CanaryRelease - Martin Fowler
Canary release is a technique to reduce the risk of introducing a new software version in production by slowly rolling out the change...
Read more >What Are Canary Deployments? Process and Visual Example
A new deployment, the “canary” is performed with brand new pods and only a small amount of traffic, e.g. 5% while maintaining 95%...
Read more >Canary Deployments - GitLab Docs
A popular Continuous Deployment strategy, where a small portion of the fleet is updated to the new version of your application.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@reallifeliver no, unfortunately not - but we needed it desperately and thats why we packaged it on our own in our private registry…
ps: working since i opened the pull request, but had no more time to reason about and explain things unfortunately
Hi Folks 👋
You will have seen in our message above that we at Nrwl are working really hard to bring the lerna repo up to date with what matters most to its community in June 2022.
As previously stated in that message, because we have not heard from the original author of this issue within the last 14 days, we are now automatically closing it.
If any users, including the original author, are still impacted by this issue then we still want to hear from you!
All we ask is that you first update to the latest lerna (
5.1.4
at the time of writing) to make sure it is still reproducible, and then fill out one of our new issue templates, providing all the requested details which apply to your situation:https://github.com/lerna/lerna/issues/new/choose
Many thanks again! 🙏
P.S. Over and above getting to grips with the repo, we have also been hard at work launching a new website, resolving all vulnerabilities, merging exciting new features and reigniting community PR contributions! 🚀
You can read our recent blog post to learn more about what we’ve been up to: https://blog.nrwl.io/lerna-5-1-new-website-new-guides-new-lerna-example-repo-distributed-caching-support-and-speed-64d66410bec7