CQT filter normalization revisited
See original GitHub issue@ejhumphrey pointed out that the CQT filter bank is not scaled by the length of the filters when norm=None
. (When norm!=None
, this doesn’t matter because length scaling washes out.)
This should be easy to fix.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:10 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
huangleiBuaa/NormalizationSurvey: This repo is for ... - GitHub
Survey on Normalization Techniques. This repo is for our paper survey paper on normalization techniques in training deep neural networks:.
Read more >Divisive normalization image quality metric revisited
In this work, the classical divisive normalization metric [1] was revisited to address the criticisms raised against error visibility techniques.
Read more >Normalization Techniques in Training DNNs - arXiv
Abstract—Normalization techniques are essential for accelerating the training and improving the generalization of deep neural networks.
Read more >CG‐SENSE revisited: Results from the first ISMRM ...
Purpose The aim of this work is to shed light on the issue of reproducibility in MR image reconstruction in the context of...
Read more >Representative Batch Normalization With Feature Calibration
3.1. Revisiting Batch Normalization. We first revisit the formulation of BatchNorm. Batch-. Norm is composed of the feature centering, feature scaling,.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
good point / generally aware of that fact … wasn’t going to b4b it, the meat of the work is adding the scalar and updating corresponding tests.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Brian McFee notifications@github.com wrote:
Fixed by merging #417