LoggerTakingImplicit is missing
See original GitHub issueHi! I found your cool library and noticed implicit context capture feature. But when I add it to my build.sbt:
libraryDependencies += "com.typesafe.scala-logging" %% "scala-logging" % "3.7.2"
i dont see method takingImplicit
in com.typesafe.scalalogging.Logger
Also, there is no such method in generated docs: https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.typesafe.scala-logging/scala-logging_2.12/3.7.2
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:6 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Logging in streams with MDC - scala - Stack Overflow
I have tried i various ways to get a logger that can take MDC parameters, but i am missing something. First i just...
Read more >Why I Wrote A Logging Library - Terse Systems
The next closest thing is MapMessage which has explicit format specifiers of "XML", "JSON" or "JAVA". I could always be missing something, but ......
Read more >Attempting to shade scala-logging dependency #293 - GitHub
LazyLogging' is missing from the classpath. This symbol is required by 'package org.locationtech.rasterframes.package'.
Read more >com.typesafe.scalalogging.Logger Scala Example
{Logger, LoggerTakingImplicit} import de.heikoseeberger.akkahttpcirce. ... path template variable not found") case Some(value) => value } }) } }. Example 99 ...
Read more >Scala-Logging Alternatives - Scala Extensions | LibHunt
Do you think we are missing an alternative of Scala-Logging or a related ... LoggerTakingImplicit provides the same methods as Logger class, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
3.8.0 is out now.
Oh. I just looked at README and it references to “3.7.2”. Ok. thanks!