`seismology` __repr__ doesnt put the mission identifier before the ID
See original GitHub issueWhen calling the repr of the seismology module, the ID appears as:
Seismology(ID: 441462736)
as opposed to the repr for a periodogram
or lightcurve
object, that would appear as
TessLightCurve(TICID: 441462736)
Specifying the mission ID in Seismology would help alleviate some confusion, but it is a minor issue.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Citizen Seismology Without Seismologists? Lessons Learned ...
First, a sociological analysis of this independent citizen science network enables an identification of the reasons for its creation and the ...
Read more >Dealing with earthquakes: the practice of seismic engineering ...
This paper sets out to explore the different ways in which communities deal with earthquakes. As is well known, the ability to recover...
Read more >What is liquefaction? | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Liquefaction takes place when loosely packed, water-logged sediments at or near the ground surface lose their strength in response to strong ground shaking....
Read more >InSight - eoPortal
InSight's seismometer will be placed directly on the Martian surface, which will provide much cleaner data. • January 23, 2018: NASA's next ...
Read more >California Missions Undergo Upgrades To Resist Quakes - NPR
Conversion these days at the state's Spanish missions isn't only about religion; it's also about seismic retrofitting.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
A bonus here is that users can override the label, so you can do clarify experiments with:
and get:
Seismology(Source: V827 Tau with 6 pixel aperture) - no values have been computed so far.
I like this! We should consistently use the
label
attribute to label data products, even if custom objects may not have it set.Minor caveat:
LombScarglePeriodogram(Source: None)
suggests that the periodogram contains “no source”, so you may want to re-word that slightly, e.g.ID: None
may be less confusing?