Lose performance between 0.6.0 and 0.7.1
See original GitHub issueš Bug
When I train exactly the same model with pl 0.7.1, I get worse performance compared to pl0.6.0. I did a fresh install or Asteroid with both versions and ran exactly the same script on the same hardware. I get significantly worse performance with pl0.7.1. Are there some known issues I should be aware of? In the mean time, Iāll have to downgrade to 0.6.0
Environment
PL 0.6.0
Collecting environment information⦠[8/105]
PyTorch version: 1.4.0
Is debug build: No
CUDA used to build PyTorch: 10.1
OS: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
GCC version: (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0
CMake version: version 3.14.0
Python version: 3.6 Is CUDA available: No CUDA runtime version: No CUDA GPU models and configuration: No CUDA Nvidia driver version: No CUDA cuDNN version: No CUDA
Versions of relevant libraries: [pip3] numpy==1.18.1 [pip3] pytorch-lightning==0.6.0 [pip3] torch==1.4.0 [pip3] torchvision==0.4.2 [conda] blas 1.0 mkl [conda] mkl 2019.4 243 [conda] mkl-include 2020.0 166 [conda] mkl-service 2.3.0 py36he904b0f_0 [conda] mkl_fft 1.0.14 py36ha843d7b_0 [conda] mkl_random 1.1.0 py36hd6b4f25_0 [conda] torch 1.3.1 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torchvision 0.4.2 pypi_0 pypi
Diff between 0.6.0 and 0.7.1 envs
diff env_0.7 env_0.6
19c19
< [pip3] pytorch-lightning==0.7.1
---
> [pip3] pytorch-lightning==0.6.0
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:53 (50 by maintainers)

Top Related StackOverflow Question
Iāve tried with 0.7.5 against 0.6.0 and got the same results on several of our architectures. Weāll finally upgrade and get all the new features you integrated š Thanks again for looking into it, Iām closing this.
Try again, I had sharing turned off. No, Colab doesnāt want to give me GPU for some reason, thatās why I tried CPU.