Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Alpine much slower?
See original GitHub issueUsing identical hardware & configuration, I’m seeing a 3-4x perf drop switching from centos.
concurrency: 4
simd: true
cache: false
vips 8.6.3-r0
Anyone else experience this slowness?
On a positive note, memory usage was drastically improved (by ~10x).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:10 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why is the Alpine Docker image over 50% slower than the ...
Alpine is using a different implementation of libc (base system library) from the musl ... musl is slower by 0.0028254222124814987 seconds.
Read more >Using Alpine can make Python Docker builds 50× slower
Alpine Linux is often recommended as a smaller, faster Docker base image. But if you're using Python, it will slow down your build...
Read more >python3.5 on docker alpine is slower than docker ubuntu #300
ubuntu 14.04 trusty image benchmark: # python3 -c 'from test import pystone; pystone.main()' Pystone(1.2) time for 50000 passes = 0.569234 ...
Read more >Alpine explain why their top speed was so slow in Barcelona
But according to Alpine, there was more to the A522's slow pace than met the eye.
Read more >Alpine makes Python Docker builds 50× slower : r/programming
Alpine it's smaller, but it might cause issues. Minimal images for Ubuntu and Debian are several times larger than Alpine, but much easier...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
webp is easy to build and has quite a lot of options, like some ASM stuff, so I think I would experiment with making my own alpine package. It should be possible to tune it up a bit.
webp is rather a young, immature library, so you can also expect dramatic speed changes between minor versions.
Closing since this isn’t a sharp issue it seems. Thanks