Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Area of Triangle produces invalid triangles
See original GitHub issueBug Description
The ‘Area of Triangle’ generator came up with the triangle 17 19 1 (or in a different order, i’m not sure), which is of course not a real triangle. The answer, according to the generator was some answer involving j, but it seems like a bug to me that this generator make non-real triangles.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 9 months ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Unit 9 Section 5 : The Area of a Triangle
This section introduces the formula for the area of a triangle, which can be seen below. The height is called the perpendicular height...
Read more >Area of triangles - Mathematics Stack Exchange
One method of calculating area yields 23 and another method for the same area gets me 13. Something is clearly incorrect, so my...
Read more >How to determine if three lengths form a triangle - YouTube
Learn about the Pythagorean theorem. The Pythagoras theorem is a fundamental relation among the three sides of a right triangle.
Read more >Zero-width triangles are produced (They have no area as one ...
EDIT: I tried release version 1.0.29, and there the problem with the zero-area triangles is not present, at least not with this shape....
Read more >Possible Triangles with Side-Side-Angle | CK-12 Foundation
It makes an isosceles triangle. You start to wonder how many different possible triangles there are for different lengths of sides.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Hi there, I believe this was fixed around a year ago in Pull 361. I just tested and the function seems to work as expected locally. I had a look at the gh-pages branch and it just appears that the statically generated data there is not updated.
Ah, I misread the #394 . It’s not a merged PR, but an issue to fix 😃