assert_all_mocked - default auto mocked
See original GitHub issueHello,
Thanks for your great tool ! its very useful.
I am not sure to well understand the option assert_all_mocked
and why the default behavior when disabled is all non-routed requests will be auto mocked with status code 200.
In my case, I trigger many httpx calls on many API. I just wanna mock one specific call (e.g. side effect) and let the rest of calls
Thanks
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
unittest.mock — mock object library — Python 3.11.1 ...
Auto -speccing creates mock objects that have the same attributes and methods ... unsafe: By default, accessing any attribute whose name starts with...
Read more >Jest how to assert method calls on mocked classes
It looks like you're calling the mocked constructor several times, and getting back several different instances of the mocked object.
Read more >Mock Functions - Jest
Mock functions allow you to test the links between code by erasing the ... These mock members are very useful in tests to...
Read more >Defining and asserting mock behavior - Unitils –
You can pass the instance that needs to be thrown or just pass the exception class. An instance will then automatically be created...
Read more >Jest Mocking Strategies | Mercedes Bernard
To mock its implementation, we use a default import, mock the module, and provide a factory (a function which will run when the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@lundberg yep I understand better . thanks for your time and you answers !
I guess your problem is solved and we can consider closing this issue @Lujeni?