Shared MD authorisation request not rejected if MD doesn't exist
See original GitHub issueWhen sending an authorisation request for shared MD, there is no response if the targeted MD doesn’t exist on the network.
Also, when clicking the x
button in an authorisation popup a “rejected” auth response is sent back to the app instead of just ignoring it and not send any response at all:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
podman/troubleshooting.md at main · containers ... - GitHub
8) Permission denied when running systemd within a Podman container. When running systemd as PID 1 inside of a container on an SELinux...
Read more >Chapter 3: Exceptions to Disclosure - Maryland Attorney General
An agency may not generally share personnel records with other agencies; however, it is implicit in the personnel records exemption that another agency...
Read more >mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting error
Try to mount the NFS share on NFS client. Ensure share is being exported to client in question. Mounting the nfs share from...
Read more >Refusal of Care - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
A patient's right to the refusal of care is founded upon one of the basic ethical principles of medicine, autonomy.
Read more >How Should Physicians Respond When Patients Distrust ...
This case highlights important issues that arise when patients request gender-concordant clinician care, particularly from medical student trainees.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hey @hunterlester, I’ve investigated this and so far found nothing out of the ordinary that would be causing any issues.
It’s valid, and it’s the same thing I see in our Rust-side
share_mdata
tests where an error is expected.This is the only part that worries me. You should be able to reference the
FfiResult
here to get the error information – it’s what we do in our Rust tests. Can you confirm that this is not an issue of garbage collection in the browser or something along those lines?I don’t see anything weird on the Rust side and we handle this error the same way as we do everywhere else. It’s possible that our current error handling is incorrect and you’ve discovered a case where the
FfiResult
value is dropped when it shouldn’t be.QA verified, ref: https://github.com/maidsafe/safe_browser/pull/554#issuecomment-470449730