Make the assertions chainable
See original GitHub issueWhat do you think about making it possible to chain assertions? That way you don’t have to call assert.dom()
multiple times (or cache it).
assert.dom('.some-class')
.exists()
.hasText('Testing')
.hasAttribute('disabled');
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Make the assertions chainable · Issue #177 - GitHub
What do you think about making it possible to chain assertions? That way you don't have to call assert.dom() multiple times (or cache...
Read more >Chained assertions - A crust of code
TL;DR: Chain assertions for scannability. Here's some code to help ... If that's true, it's useful to arrange tests to make scanning easier....
Read more >Building a Helper - Chai Assertion Library
Providing chainable helper assertions is the most common use of the plugin utilities that Chai exposes. Before we get into the basics, we...
Read more >Grouping Assertions With and or with - Strikt
Strikt provides the and and with functions, and several varieties of with* , that are used to add a block of assertions to...
Read more >Assertions | Cypress Documentation
They don't actually do anything, but they enable you to write clear, english sentences. Chainable getters. to , be , been , is...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I’m trying to remember. I think there was a reason that prevented it, but I don’t recall what it was… 🤔
I came here while researching if this is allowed. Have we found a strong reason to block this?