Question Marks in URL for State
See original GitHub issueIt looks like quotation marks are not allowed in the string being passed to initImplicitFlow()
to keep track of state. We are looking to pass in the requested URL along with its query parameters and it looks like it errors out when we add in the ?
.
Example: this.oauthService.initImplicitFlow('http://www.xyz.com/resource/sub?department=test');
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What is the meaning of ? (question mark) in a URL string?
It is a query to pass paramters. ?pagename=navigation passes the value 'navigation' to the pagename parameter. Share.
Read more >What does a question mark do in a URL? - Quora
A question mark is used to introduce a parameter list. If it's at the end, there are no parameters. Why does a question...
Read more >How To Fix a URL Question Mark Issue - Sitechecker
In a URL, the question mark (“?”) divides the address of an object and the set of words used in the query. Consider...
Read more >Is it valid to include digits and question marks in the URL slug ...
Using question marks in the slug is only allowed in their percent-encoded form. You may decide to omit this character (or all characters...
Read more >Query string contains a question mark | Sitebulb
In a URL, the query starts with a question mark - the question mark is used as a separator, and is not part...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I was able to work-around this by “custom-encoding” the original route:
Obviously, not the preferred solution, but it should work…
Thanks, we will go forward with the work around as its easy enough to use and probably should be used anyway since we are passing along an actual URL.