Doesn't conform to the spec
See original GitHub issueThese are valid, but unhandled, e-mail addresses:
name(nested (comment))@example.com
"my name"@example.com
See this link for more details:
http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate-an-email-address-until-i.aspx/
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:13
Top Results From Across the Web
not conform to the specification | English examples in context
High quality example sentences with “not conform to the specification” in context from reliable sources - Ludwig is the linguistic search engine that...
Read more >4 - Stack Overflow
Call to clojure.core/defn did not conform to spec. I have no idea what causes the error, but an exception is thrown with this:...
Read more >Does not conform to the spec when aborting an error #416
When a request is aborted, fetch-mock throws a regular Error, but the spec (and node-fetch behaviour) is to throw an AbortError.
Read more >Does Not Conform Definition | Law Insider
Does Not Conform means that deficiencies in practice are judged to deviate from the Standards and the Code of Ethics, and are significant...
Read more >conform - clojure.spec.alpha - ClojureDocs
(conform spec x). Given a spec and a value, returns :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid if value does not match spec, else the (possibly destructured) value.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
‘Valid’ is one thing, but ‘sane’ is another.
The library is called “email-validator” - that implies to me that it should assert validity. To me being truly “valid” means exact and correct in every formal variation. The first post listed several addresses that are valid but that this check fails - that is not a validator, so either the code is wrong or the name is wrong. Maybe “email-approximator” or “email-(ad-hoc-informal-subset-of-valid)ator”.