Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Negative filter for editor

See original GitHub issue

I’m submitting a feature request

Brief Description

There should be a way to filter the editor in using a negative (or “inverse”) expression.

What is the motivation / use case for this feature?

For example, if we want to filter all the editions made with JOSM we can simply use josm But we can’t filter all the editions that were not made with JOSM (eg, something like a -josm)

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 6 years ago
Reactions:14
Comments:6

Top GitHub Comments

8reactions

andrewharveycommented, Feb 18, 2021

This would be really useful to filter out StreetComplete edits, which can create a ton of changesets, and the damage one can do through StreetComplete is more limited so one might want to just skip reviewing all these edits.

2reactions

zorglubucommented, Mar 19, 2021

This would be really useful to filter out StreetComplete edits, which can create a ton of changesets, and the damage one can do through StreetComplete is more limited so one might want to just skip reviewing all these edits.

I totally agree. I was going to ask the same thing : the ability to filter out StreetComplete edits, in order to focus on real risks.