Basemap License
See original GitHub issueWhat is basemap’s license? setup.py says OSI Approved and PKG-INFO says UNKNOWN.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
basemap-styles/LICENSE.md at master · CartoDB ... - GitHub
The visual design features of the style (also known as the "look and feel" of the map) are licensed under the Creative Commons...
Read more >ArcGIS Online Basemap Imagery Licensing - Esri Community
I am looking for licensing information for the basemap imagery available in ArcGIS Online. Specifically, I am looking for guidance on ...
Read more >Pricing - BaseMap
Public/Private Land Ownership ; Unlimited Offline Maps ; Unlimited Offline Maps ; 3D Maps Hi-Res Terrain.
Read more >Basemap attribution | Documentation - ArcGIS Developers
Basemap attribution is required when building and deploying mapping applications that use the Basemap layer service. There are two types of attribution that ......
Read more >Welcome to the Matplotlib Basemap Toolkit documentation
Basemap is deprecated in favor of the Cartopy project. See notes in Cartopy, New Management, and EoL Announcement for more details.
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Specifically, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_3
However, I think this should be made a bit more clear everywhere.
A bit of additional history… I have had discussions with those who maintain GMT a few years ago about their license. The discussion centered around whether or not it was even valid to apply a software license to data files. Basically, my interpretation of the situation was that the GMT data files were potentially unlicensed and that they needed an open data license such as a creative commons license in order for them to really be properly protected.
Legal questions aside, as a practical matter, the authors of GMT were well aware of Basemap’s usage of their GSHHS data and they seemed perfectly fine with how basemap was being used and distributed. It also should be noted that the actual GSHHS data itself was never actually bundled with basemap. Rather, GMT was used to do an initial preprocessing of the original data, and then some python scripts in the codebase would extract out the needed information and store it into an easy-for-basemap-to-use form. So, because of these hoops the data had to jump through, I had serious doubts that a software license was even applicable.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 3:02 PM Víctor Molina García < @.***> wrote: