Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
[BUG]Maximum number of transactions reached
See original GitHub issueV5.08
Exception Maximum number of transactions reached
CODE
var col = _db.GetCollection<T>(typeof(T).Name); result = col.Find(bse).ToList();
var col = _db.GetCollection<T>(typeof(T).Name); t = col.FindById(new ObjectId(Id)) :
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:9 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
[BUG] LiteDB 5.0.10 - Maximum number of transactions ...
@byteAbit0101 LiteDB has a limit of 100 open transactions at a time. If youy program happens to create a lot of these FindOneAsync...
Read more >How to fix "You have exceeded the maximum number of ...
Hello there,. The error message "You have exceeded the maximum number of allowable transactions. Please try again later" typically indicates ...
Read more >New-MsolUser : You have exceeded the maximum number ...
I've been using this code for more than 2 months. And just got error 2 today ago. So I use this code :...
Read more >Postgres-XL happens ERROR:maximum number of ...
Client NN aborted in state 13: ERROR: maximum number of prepared transactions reached HINT: Increase max_prepared_transactions (currently ...
Read more >What is the solution for this error 'You have exceeded ...
This means you are exceeding the transaction limit set by your bank. Generally it's 1lakh including of various upi apps you may use...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I encountered the same exception, which was caused by the heavy use of threads within Parallel.ForEach. Unfortunately, the TransactionService for a closed thread will not be removed from the _transactions dictionary within the TransactionMonitor. Here a finalizer for the TransactionService has to be added, which takes care of removing the transaction from the _transactions dictionary. I will provide a fix for this.
It is fixed in the latest release.