Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Embedded/Effective Javascript
See original GitHub issueHi, I’m unsure as to what the actual name of EJS is, both in the scope of the ‘language’ and of this project.
On www.ejs.co only ‘effective’ is used. However, it seems that this is more in a sentence context: “effective javascript templating - ejs” implies that ejs == effective javascript, but it’s not explicitly mentioned.
In this repository, only ‘embedded’ is used (which in my mind is better).
I’m opening this issue because these things lead me to believe that the maintainer(s) of this project don’t know either! Let me know what you think.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@meesfrensel Take a look at the site. I’ve made some updates. Thank you very much for the feedback. Super helpful!
Yes, it’s “embedded.” It’s right there in the title tag for the HTML page. The “effective” language is really just fun marketing copy." Maybe it could be either one. Does it really matter that much?
The folks at NPM insist that it does not stand for “Node Package Manager” – indeed, that it is not even an acronym. (They also insist that everyone write it in lowercase.)
Do we have to choose? Maybe the “e” could stand for “elegant.” Or “elusive,” for when your template refuses to render. Or just “excellent.” 😀