Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Output literal `%>` with `%%>`
See original GitHub issueThe same as <%% that outputs literal <%, but at the opposite direction. I haven’t found it in the lexer, so I guess it doesn’t seem to work in any way.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:9 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Template literals (Template strings) - JavaScript | MDN
Template literals are literals delimited with backtick (`) characters, allowing for multi-line strings, string interpolation with embedded ...
Read more >String literal - Wikipedia
A string literal or anonymous string is a string value in the source code of a computer program. Modern programming languages commonly use...
Read more >How do i output a javascript template literal to the console
Depending on the overall goal here, I would maybe set another variable, say y to the string of the template literal. var y...
Read more >Literals in Python - GeeksforGeeks
A string literal can be created by writing a text(a group of Characters ) ... a value or to get the output they...
Read more >string interpolation - format string output - Microsoft Learn
To identify a string literal as an interpolated string, prepend it with the $ symbol. You can't have any white space between the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@RyanZim Sure. I’m on it.
(Sorry, initially replied with my work account.)
I can imagine the use for a literal closing tag. And yes, we wouldn’t want to break existing functionality.
Let’s leave this open and implement if possible.