Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
InfluxNamingConvention formats tag values incorrectly
See original GitHub issueThe tag values are treated the same way as keys in InfluxNamingConvention which results in values like org.example.service to be converted to org_example_service
Take a look at: InfluxNamingConvention.java#L63
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
InfluxDB schema design and data layout
InfluxDB schema design and data layout ; Where to store data (tag or field); Avoid too many series; Use recommended naming conventions; Shard...
Read more >Change tag value in InfluxDB - Stack Overflow
I looked at trying to copy data from one table to another, manually specifying the new tag name, but I didn't seem to...
Read more >[Training] InfluxDB Performance Tuning and Schema Design
In this discussion, Gunnar Aasen from the InfluxData Support and Services team will cover best practices for tuning queries plus strategies ...
Read more >Save 90% Disk Space By Compacting Your InfluxDB
The problem is either too many tags or tags with very many different values. Both result in a higher amount of possible combinations...
Read more >Top 5 Hurdles for Flux Beginners and Resources for Learning ...
Perhaps you're an InfluxDB v1.x user and you're familiar with InfluxQL, and… ... r.my-tag-key == "my-tag-value"
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Good catch. Thanks @iabudiab. We’ll fix this for the upcoming 1.0.5 release.
@bckfnn exactly! apologize for my poor english.