DeepSpeed initialization with GNN-like model
See original GitHub issueMy code is quite similar to some GNN structure : NN_output = graph.forward(NN_input, types=“f”)
So, outputs = model_engine(inputs) seems does not really fit in my case ? args
also does not follow such code styling.
Any idea ?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:20 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Training Setup — DeepSpeed 0.8.0 documentation
The entrypoint for all training with DeepSpeed is deepspeed.initialize() . Will initialize distributed backend if it is not initialized already.
Read more >Getting Started - DeepSpeed
DeepSpeed model training is accomplished using the DeepSpeed engine. ... deepspeed.initialize ensures that all of the necessary setup ...
Read more >DeepSpeed Integration - Hugging Face
i.e. you will need to re-initialize the deepspeed engine, since model.load_state_dict(state_dict) will remove all the DeepSpeed magic from it. So do this only ......
Read more >DeepSpeed - Microsoft Research
DeepSpeed, part of Microsoft AI at Scale, is a deep learning optimization library that makes distributed training ... Reshape Large Model Training Landscape....
Read more >Enabling Efficient Inference of Transformer Models at ... - arXiv
high inference throughput with large models which do not fit in aggregate GPU memory. DeepSpeed Inference reduces latency by up to 7.3× over....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@buttercutter, #1149 is now merged. Please try master.
Set “train_micro_batch_size_per_gpu” to 8 in the configuration file.