Variable merging
See original GitHub issuedeclare var test: (s: string) => void;
declare var test: {
(s: string) => void;
tests: any[];
}
At the moment TS compiler shows error: Subsequent variable declarations must have the same type.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:8 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Merging variables - Ipsos
You can merge two or more variables to form a new variable. This is useful when you want to create a total awareness...
Read more >To merge variables
You can merge two variables, or merge a variable with another object. The variables must be dimension objects, and must come from different...
Read more >13 Merging | Data Wrangling with R
13 Merging | Data Wrangling with R. ... A simple merge adds the data values in one data set as new variables to...
Read more >Merge/Append using Stata - Princeton University
Merge – adds variables to a dataset. Type help merge for details. Merging two datasets require that both have at least one variable...
Read more >Inserting merge variables onto a layout
You can create a merge variable that displays a value from a variable. You can use merge variables for some tasks in place...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
It might be useful to support this in the particular case of a property of type
any
. Often DefinitelyTyped declarations will declare something to be of typeany
when a particular user will know a better type.Currently we give an error because the types for
foo
conflict. We might just throw out any declarations typed asany
when getting the type.redeclare
can have other benefits:I have a “header” type of interface:
I want to have extended interface:
if there is no inex type in
api_msg_t
the typeguardis_api_node_online
fails to transpile asm.nid
does not exist inapi_msg_t
. But adding index in theapi_msg_t
propagates it toapi_node_online_t
that is undesirable. if we can doIt will allow for elegant and typesafe solution.
We can easily mimic this behavior with
but this results in unnecessary JS code emitted and ran