Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Add custom QuickPick highlighting
See original GitHub issueIt would be nice to have a bit more control over highlighting in QuickPick. I’m using QuickPick as a search field using regex and the existing fuzzy matching doesn’t make sense in this context. I’d like to be able to provide my own highlights for the detail field and avoid highlighting elsewhere, although for completion I think it makes sense to allow custom highlighting on all three fields.
The API could be similar to the proposed highlighted TreeItemLabel in #61482 for backward compatibility. A more general HighlightedString could be a good fit across the board. The implementation can then skip the fuzzy matching if the label type is HighlightedString and apply the highlights in there.
I feel that this would complement #77297 nicely and make for a more versatile QuickPick API.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:26 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Great so back to my original question:
@kbysiec No. It is in our list of feature requests for the QuickPick API.