Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
JediLSP experiment regressing with `jedi-language-server` update
See original GitHub issuejedi-language-server was updated with https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/pull/16661, and it seems like the likely cause why the scorecard for the experiment regressed https://exp.microsoft.com/xCard/?view=655c4209-b193-4e74-ba1f-74a49f04d852. This issue to investigate and open issues at https://github.com/pappasam/jedi-language-server accordingly.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
September 2021 Milestone - GitHub
Test absence of "The Python extension will have limited support for 2.7" ... JediLSP experiment regressing with jedi-language-server update ...
Read more >Python in VS Code Improves Jedi Language Server Support
"As a result, we've updated Jedi to abide by the Language Server Protocol (LSP). Alongside improved performance for features like completions ...
Read more >Python (Jedi Language Server) - LSP support for Emacs
Language Server Protocol Support for Emacs.
Read more >Python in Visual Studio Code – September 2021 Release
Once the Python extension activates, you will see the Test Explorer on the activity ... delete, or update any python file in the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Verification is not needed for this, just realized that it is necessary to add the
verifiedlabel if an issue is to be skipped.No, I think the issue was resolved with the experiment cache fix. Also, we have not seen anyone complain about this so far.