SettingsMigrator: Remote execution is not added in .runsettings
See original GitHub issueDescription
I used SettingsMigrator.exe tool for convert .testsettings to . runsettings. Remote execution parameters has been skipped in .runsettings file
Expected behavior
Add remote execution settings in converted .runsettings file
Actual behavior
TestSettings:
<RemoteController name="Testcontroller" />
<Execution location="Remote" parallelTestCount="2">
Converted .runsettings file
<MSTest>
<ForcedLegacyMode>true</ForcedLegacyMode>
</MSTest>
<LegacySettings>
<Execution parallelTestCount="2">
Is any ability to execute automated tests on remote Test controllers with .runsettings file?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Remote execution is not added in .runsettings · Issue # ...
Description I used SettingsMigrator.exe tool for convert .testsettings to . runsettings. Remote execution parameters has been skipped in ...
Read more >Is there a way to include 'Remote Controller name' in *. ...
As i'm having a custom *.srprofile file for TFS, I have to use a .runsettings file instead of .testsettings file. I can not...
Read more >Migrate testsettings to runsettings - Visual Studio (Windows)
Learn how to migrate testsettings to runsettings.
Read more >Azure DevOps unit test result not being published
Hello community Since a few days we are facing a weird issue on Azure DevOps, regarding our unit test results; some of them...
Read more >SpecFlow+ Runner
SpecFlow+ Runner is a dedicated test runner for SpecFlow that integrates directly with Visual Studio. You can also execute tests from the ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@AndrewASel , the recommended way to distribute test is to use the multi agent settings in the pipeline itself. Please read https://aka.ms/testingwithphases for more info.
@AndrewASel Testing on hosted agents is supported. It has chorme and firefox browsers installed. Coded UI is not supported on hosted agents but you can run UI tests with selenium and that is the recommended approach as well. Or you can set your own agents and install anything you want. There will not be one single combined trx, but you will have one single consolidated test reporting on the server. Sure, please try this out and get back in case of questions.