can't read new brainvision markers?
See original GitHub issueWhen reading a brainvision file (available here, after extracting
EEG_data/EEG_excluded.zip/vic0001.vhdr
EEG_data/hdr_mrk_files/vic0001.vmrk
EEG_data/hdr_mrk_files/vic0001.vhdr
)
The following command
raw = mne.io.read_raw_brainvision('vic0001.vhdr')
leads to
ValueError: MNE-Python currently only supports marker versions 1.0 and 2.0, got unparsable '[Marker Infos]'.
Contact MNE-Python developers for support.
I am thus contacting MNE-Python developers for support :]
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
INFO: Missing markers in BrainVision Analyzer [39520]
INFO: Missing markers in BrainVision Analyzer [39520] ... use BPPauseRecording and BPContinueRecording to define when a new segment begins.
Read more >Tricks and tips in BrainVision Analyzer 2 – Part I
Here are 10 simple, but valuable tricks and tips that will make your work with BrainVision Analyzer even easier and more efficient.
Read more >Analyzer 2 Tips 2 - I would like to add a new marker to my ...
When all new markers were inserted, you need to select “OK” to finish. ... The template does not have to be applied to...
Read more >Brain Vision Recorder | User Manual - TSG Doc
Pause the recording. To continue, click on the button Record . A new segment marker will be set. You can stop recording with...
Read more >Data format for import from BrainVision Analyser - Discussions
or .eeg), one for the header (.vhdr) and one for markers (.vmrk). And then, I'm ... the screen : “Cannot read files :“C://(file...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I guess we could just
warn
in this case that the file might not work correctly. It seems like a bug with whatever wrote this file that the given line is missingGo for it!