VIZ: EEG sensor locations wrong in inset plots
See original GitHub issueEEG sensor plot insets seem to be broken in some cases. Here are a couple examples. First, from plot_compare_evokeds
:
Similar problem with `evoked.plot(spatial_colors=True):
Compare those to the sensor positions w/r/t the head on mne.channels.make_eeg_layout(raw.info).plot()
(raw.plot_sensors()
gives similar result):
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
mne.viz.plot_compare_evokeds — MNE 1.2.2 documentation
Plot evoked time courses for one or more conditions and/or ... Whether to display an inset showing sensor locations on a head outline....
Read more >Human Cortical θ during Free Exploration Encodes Space ...
The color represents the EEG signal along the trajectory. All the points labeled w1 are a fixed distance, in both x and y,...
Read more >Misaligned viz.plot_compare_evokeds - Support & Discussions
Hi, I'm trying to use viz.plot_compare_evokeds to obtain an ERP plot per channel ... how ticks (numbers in the axis) seem to appear...
Read more >| Power spectra averaged over all active electrode signals ...
The insets show the power spectra of some of the corresponding reference signals. from publication: The Influence of EEG References on the Analysis...
Read more >Losses resulting from deliberate exploration trigger beta ... - bioRxiv
(A) Timecourses of β-band power averaged over three most significant sensors (shown in the inset at the top). Each graph represents two timecourses...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I don’t see this as a blocker for 0.18, which we want to get out tomorrow if possible. So moving the milestone to 0.19.
@jona-sassenhagen @drammock can you check my proposal here:
https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/3987#issuecomment-298920228
I argue that these plots should always show the sensors reasonably aligned to a ~80cm head. Then it doesn’t matter what subselection, etc. you use. For MEG you align using
dev_head_t
and for EEG you’re already in head coords so should be fine. It should be more true to the data and head alignment, and avoid these rescaling issues altogether.Also related: #5472, #5471