Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Isosurface Representation Quality
See original GitHub issueHey,
For isosurface representations, when I am changing the quality levels, I am not noticing much change in the actual representation. Between the highest and lowest quality, it seems that the only change is possibly lighting or a slight smoothing (see the screenshots). The first is using lowest quality and the second screenshot is using highest quality.
With NGL, I was able to use the smooth property to make the volume more rounded and without the sharp angles seen. Is there something similar in Molstar?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:8 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@iainmaryanow
This is weird, trying gaussian surface for ligand in 4KTC:
Lower quality:
High quality:
Can you please share the data/code you are using for this?
@stefdoerr This seems like a difference between Gaussian and Molecular Surface:
Gaussian:
Molecular Surface:
Yes, don’t worry about it for now since it seems like it mostly happens just on my machine and it’s not even fully consistent, I sometimes have issues replicating it. I have a GeForce MX250 which seems to hit 100% usage when hovering (for both viewers). Anyway, thanks for the info! I will for sure also compare your own viewer because it might be related to our setup.