Mock response is overwritten with {}
See original GitHub issueEnvironment
Name | Version |
---|---|
msw | 0.36.4 |
node | v16.13.0 |
OS | MAC 12.0.1 |
Request handlers
setup:
// Establish API mocking before all tests.
beforeAll(() => server.listen({
onUnhandledRequest: 'warn',
}))
// Reset any request handlers that we may add during the tests,
// so they don't affect other tests.
afterEach(() => {
server.resetHandlers();
// This is the solution to clear RTK Query cache after each test
store.dispatch(orchestrator.util.resetApiState());
});
// Clean up after the tests are finished.
afterAll(() => server.close())
handler:
import { rest } from 'msw'
export const handlers = [
rest.post('http://localhost/cash-advance/validate', (req, res, ctx) => {
return res(
ctx.status(200),
ctx.json({"linkId":"123","validationState":"VALID_CUSTOMER","customer":{}}),
)
})
];
Actual request
I am using RTK Query
// Example of making a request. Provide your code here.
const {
data,
isError,
error,
refetch: refetchPostInitialize,
} = usePostValidateQuery(linkId, {
skip: linkId == null || idToken === '',
});
Here is the createAPI:
export const orchestrator = createApi({
reducerPath: 'orchestrator',
baseQuery,
endpoints: (builder) => ({
postValidate: builder.query({
query: (linkId: string | undefined) => ({
url: `cash-advance/validate?linkId=${linkId}`,
method: 'POST',
}),
}),
Current behavior
When I run the test it appears to return nothing. when I run the test using the debug package with DEBUG=* I see the following:
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id received mocked response {
status: 200,
statusText: 'OK',
headers: { 'x-powered-by': 'msw', 'content-type': 'application/json' },
body: '{"linkId":"123","validationState":"VALID_CUSTOMER","customer":{}}'
} +149ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "loadstart" (1) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "loadstart" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id set response status 200 OK +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id set response headers HeadersPolyfill {
_headers: { 'x-powered-by': 'msw', 'content-type': 'application/json' },
_names: Map(2) {
'x-powered-by' => 'x-powered-by',
'content-type' => 'content-type'
}
} +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id readyState change 1 -> 2 +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id triggerring readystate change... +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "readystatechange" (2) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "readystatechange" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id response type blob +1ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id coerced response body to {"linkId":"123","validationState":"VALID_CUSTOMER","customer":{}} +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id get response header "content-type" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolved response header "content-type" to "application/json" HeadersPolyfill {
_headers: { 'x-powered-by': 'msw', 'content-type': 'application/json' },
_names: Map(2) {
'x-powered-by' => 'x-powered-by',
'content-type' => 'content-type'
}
} +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolving response body as Blob { type: 'application/json' } +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id get response header "Content-Type" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolved response header "Content-Type" to "application/json" HeadersPolyfill {
_headers: { 'x-powered-by': 'msw', 'content-type': 'application/json' },
_names: Map(2) {
'x-powered-by' => 'x-powered-by',
'content-type' => 'content-type'
}
} +1ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id set response body Blob {} +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id readyState change 2 -> 3 +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id triggerring readystate change... +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "readystatechange" (3) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "readystatechange" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "progress" (3) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "progress" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id readyState change 3 -> 4 +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id triggerring readystate change... +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "readystatechange" (4) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "readystatechange" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "load" (4) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "load" +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id get all response headers +1ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id trigger "loadend" (4) +0ms
XHR POST cash-advance/validate?linkId=link_id resolve listener for event "loadend" +0ms
At the beginning I see the mock response. Then further down I see “response type blob” then “set response body Blob {}”. The UI gets nothing in the data variable. It is undefined which would correspond to the api returning {}.
Expected behavior
I expect the data variable to get
{"linkId":"123","validationState":"VALID_CUSTOMER","customer":{}}
Screenshots
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:6 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to overwrite the mocked data for a module in different ...
I have a scenario where I have to update the mocked response for a module with different set of values in a different...
Read more >Overwriting Mocks in Jasmine - Bambielli's Blog
TIL how to overwrite mocks in tests, by saving them to a variable and modifying the function tied to the object.
Read more >Can we overwrite mocked values returned in LWC Jest?
I thought it should theoretically by possible to mock a custom label differently on a per-test basis. I explored some options involving jest ......
Read more >Jest Mocking Strategies | Mercedes Bernard
Recently, I've been spending more time wrestling with uncooperative mocks than writing the code or the tests combined. I created this post to ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@edwinvrgs, we’re mentioning the request integrity with the GraphQL client here. It may not be obvious at first but you need to compose the same response in regards to what the client expects. In the case of Apollo, all fields must have
__typename
. Apollo will strip off any fields that don’t. This is a behavior not specific to MSW in any way.Fixed by using
__typename
.