What's the best start of cell marker for Python and Julia scripts?
See original GitHub issueWe’re currently using # + {}
as start of cell marker. But possibly # +
(when not following a commented line) would be just enough. And also, Hydrogen seems to use # %%name of cell
. Can we design a common, simple and clear pattern?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Python Experience from a Julia Perspective | by Erik Engheim
Here are some of my observations about using Python again after primarily using Julia for my scripting needs. First Impressions. The built in...
Read more >Jupyter Notebooks as Markdown Documents, Julia, Python or ...
Jupyter Notebooks as Markdown Documents, Julia, Python or R Scripts¶. Have you always wished Jupyter notebooks were plain text documents?
Read more >Machine Learning in Julia - Towards Data Science
Run Julia in Jupyter Notebook · Download and install Julia from their website · Open the Julia Command Line · Run the command...
Read more >My mental load using Julia is much higher than, e.g., in Python ...
Hi, I'm new to the language, and although I like so many aspects of Julia, I am struggling to start using it. I...
Read more >Setting up a Julia workflow in Emacs - Hersh Singh
This is my favorite part of the workflow. Julia code between ### is treated as a “cell”. If you press C-Ret , the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Sure! Yet,
For now I would be in favor of
# + {}
to# +
for explicit code cells with no metadataI’ll work on an Hydrogen/VS code/Spyder compatible format at #59 (see there for possible specifications of the format). With this issue I’ll just simplify
# + {}
into the lighter# +
when possible.