Pass tag name to "tagValueProcessor" and "attrValueProcessor"

What do you think about passing a tag name to tagValueProcessor and attrValueProcessor? That’s might be helpful to choose parse logic depends on tags name (my case).

[andreafspeziale]

@infacto @amitguptagwl Hello everyone!

Shouldn’t the tagValueProcessor signature be something like this?

tagValueProcessor: (tagName: string, tagValue: string, jPath: string, hasAttributes: boolean, isLeafNode: boolean) => unknown;

Instead of returning a string?

Otherwise I’m missing the point… I would use it like that

tagValueProcessor: (tagName, tagValue) => {
  switch (tagName) {
    case 'created_at':
      return new Date(tagValue)
  }

  return value;
};

Or there is any other way to achieve it?

[amitguptagwl]

Ah! my bad. Yes, it passes their values. We can modify it to pass the tag name.