[Suggestion] Ideas about ReviewNB
See original GitHub issueI have come across https://www.reviewnb.com/ (see GH https://github.com/ReviewNB) some time back and didn’t know what it was for but I recently looked into it and installed it as a GH.
It helps to review notebooks in PRs when we make changes to such files.
Also, it may be an idea to integrate nbqa
(maybe long shot) into ReviewNB - worth playing around with the idea.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Introducing ReviewNB: Visual Diff for Jupyter Notebooks
I'm excited to announce ReviewNB, a tool that helps you version control & code review Jupyter Notebooks.
Read more >Jupyter Notebooks on GitHub: Real-World Examples
You can start a discussion on any notebook cell with ReviewNB. For example, data scientists could suggest new changes and track task status....
Read more >Consider using ReviewNB for notebook code reviews #292
Jupyter Notebooks are great for documentation, however, reviewing code in notebooks is a pain and often requires reviewing changes locally.
Read more >Harvard Business Review - Ideas and Advice for Leaders
Find new ideas and classic advice on strategy, innovation and leadership, for global leaders from the world's best business and management experts.
Read more >Peer Review & Collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks
GitHub doesn't yet support review or discussion workflow for notebooks. The notebook reviewer might have some questions, clarifications, suggestions for the ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
🤣 sure, please do keep the ideas coming!
OK, I see - convincing reviewnb to incorporate this into their review process would be too awesome to be true, but I can’t really see it happening (for one thing, users wouldn’t necessarily agree to their choice of formatter/linter), and because they seem to be focused on clear and understandable diffs between notebooks, rather than on the contents of the notebooks themselves. And their source code isn’t open source so we can’t extend it, as far as I can tell