[RFC] more fuzzy matcher
See original GitHub issueAs per https://github.com/ncm2/ncm2/issues/21
However, pure fuzzy match may not be a good idea.
Here’s a proposal:
For candidate like HelloWorld, split it into Hello and World,
We only allow substr match in Hello, and World,
So ellold should match ell in Hello, rld in World.
But with eoworld , eo shouldn’t match Hello. So it should not match HelloWorld
I’m not sure what sort priority is better. It seems the abbrfuzzy still works for this proposal.
// cc @balta2ar
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:9 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
RFC 6203: IMAP4 Extension for Fuzzy Search
RFC 6203 IMAP4 FUZZY Search March 2011 1. Introduction When humans perform searches in IMAP clients, they typically want to see the most...
Read more >IMAP4 Extension for Fuzzy Search RFC 6203 - IETF Datatracker
For example, a fuzzy search might adapt to a user's search habits in an attempt to give more relevant results (in a "learning"...
Read more >C & P Search Rewrite RFC - Koha Wiki
i. When Solr is in use, “fuzzy” means either that accents are ignored, or that searches will match words with similar spellings based...
Read more >Fuzzy Search | Search API - TomTom Developer Portal
Purpose The generic, default service is Fuzzy Search which handles the most fuzzy of inputs containing any combination of Indexes abbreviation values.
Read more >Create a fuzzy match (Power Query) - Microsoft Support
When you join table columns, you no longer require and exact match. Fuzzy matching lets you compare items in separate lists and join...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

@fcying
You could try this config for now:
Read https://github.com/ncm2/ncm2/pull/23 for more info
Thank you! Because I have only one plugin that is likely to require fuzzy matching, I enabled it only there and I’ll see how it goes.