[BUG] - qhub-dask hasn't been updated from 0.3.13 and is inconsistent with docs
See original GitHub issueOS system and architecture in which you are running QHub
all
Expected behavior
dask-qhub pins seem to be inconsistent across the repo.
In dask-worker yaml we have:
name: base
channels:
- conda-forge
dependencies:
# dask
- qhub-dask==0.3.13
But in docs we say to use:
- qhub-dask==||QHUB_VERSION||
This should mean use dask-qhub 0.4.1 but only 0.4.0 exists on conda-forge. Even just specifying qhub-dask without a pin should bring in 0.4.0
Actual behavior
This could potentially cause problems if we are using different versions of distributed and dask-gateway in end user environments from what is present in the dask-worker.
How to Reproduce the problem?
N/A
Command output
No response
Versions and dependencies used.
No response
Compute environment
No response
Integrations
Dask
Anything else?
- We should add to the release checklist some steps to keep the versions of dask/distributed/dask-gateway + qhub-dask updated properly in the codebase and on condaforge
- I think we need to explore whether we need to pin all three dask/distributed and dask-gateway or whether we can get away with just pinning gateway and maybe distributed. There are lots on few features being added to Dask very rapidly nowadays and being able to use the latest Dask is a high priority. This might need to break out into a new issue.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
No results found
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I think so.
I will be closing this issue as completed, due to its requirements already being completed:
I will open a separate issue to address how we should move forward updating
qhub-dask