Problems with SpikesMask when running more than one participant
See original GitHub issueRunning mriqc from inside singularity container created with docker2singularity and poldracklab/mriqc:latest from dockerhub.
Run params were:
Settings={'bids_dir': '/data/Xscanner/bids_mriqc_test', 'write_graph': True, 'testing': False,
'hmc_afni': True, 'hmc_fsl': False, 'fft_spikes_detector': False, 'n_procs': 32, 'ants_nthreads': 8, 'output_dir': '/data/Xscanner/mriqc_single_node/output', 'work_dir': '/data/Xscanner/mriqc_single_node/work', 'verbose_reports': True, 'float32': False, 'ica': True, 'no_sub': True, 'email': '', 'fd_thres': 0.2, 'webapi_url': 'https://mriqc.nimh.nih.gov/api/v1', 'webapi_port': None, 'upload_strict': False, 'deoblique': False, 'despike': False, 'correct_slice_timing': False, 'report_dir': '/data/Xscanner/mriqc_single_nod
e/output/reports'}
Got error:
2017-06-28 16:12:34,261 workflow:INFO ***********************************
2017-06-28 16:12:34,261 workflow:ERROR could not run node: workflow_enumerator.funcMRIQC.ReportsWorkflow.SpikesMask.a21
2017-06-28 16:12:34,261 workflow:INFO crashfile: /data/Xscanner/mriqc_single_node/output/logs/crash-20170628-152645-varadajc-SpikesMask.a21-2ac87aca-2936-40ef-82f6-332605ce5a65.txt
2017-06-28 16:12:34,261 workflow:INFO ***********************************
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/miniconda/bin/mriqc", line 11, in <module>
load_entry_point('mriqc==0.9.6', 'console_scripts', 'mriqc')()
File "/usr/local/miniconda/lib/python3.6/site-packages/mriqc/bin/mriqc_run.py", line 304, in main
workflow.run(**plugin_settings)
File "/usr/local/miniconda/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/engine/workflows.py", line 590, in run
runner.run(execgraph, updatehash=updatehash, config=self.config)
File "/usr/local/miniconda/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/plugins/base.py", line 279, in run
report_nodes_not_run(notrun)
File "/usr/local/miniconda/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/plugins/base.py", line 101, in report_nodes_not_run
raise RuntimeError(('Workflow did not execute cleanly. '
RuntimeError: Workflow did not execute cleanly. Check log for details
I have attached the error file.
I do not get this error if I only run one participant at a time.
crash-20170628-152645-varadajc-SpikesMask.a21-2ac87aca-2936-40ef-82f6-332605ce5a65.txt
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:18 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why it could be dangerous to exercise with a face mask on
One of them is around breathing. When playing sport, breathing is faster and harder than at rest, which increases the risk of passing...
Read more >Effect of Wearing Surgical Face Masks During Exercise
In our study as well, participants, when wearing a mask, reported marked discomfort, including feeling hot, humid, and resistance on breathing.
Read more >Effects of Prolonged Use of Facemask on Healthcare Workers ...
This study suggests that prolonged use of facemasks induces difficulty in breathing on exertion and excessive sweating around the mouth to the ...
Read more >Spike Protein Behavior | Science | AAAS
So the reports of Spike protein trouble are interesting and important for coronavirus infection, but they do not mean that the vaccines ...
Read more >Effects of wearing a cloth face mask on performance ...
Conclusion Cloth face masks led to a 14% reduction in exercise time and 29% decrease in VO2max, attributed to perceived discomfort associated with...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

Those are warnings, I think they are unrelated to this issue (will follow-up in #589)
@jvarada Sorry for the delay. I will brew a 0.9.7-rc1 when #581 is fixed 😃
Thanks!