"@field" decorator give an type error
See original GitHub issueAfter update 0.15.0 the “field” decorator started to give an error in typescrip.
Unable to resolve signature of property decorator when called as an expression.
This expression is not callable.
Not all constituents of type 'Object | RawDecorator' are callable.
Type 'Object' has no call signatures.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:12
- Comments:12 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Decorated field gives read only error in TypeScript
The decorator itself is the function with the signature (target: object, propertyKey: string, descriptor: PropertyDescriptor) => ...
Read more >Error Handling in Python using Decorators - GeeksforGeeks
Decorators in Python is one of the most useful concepts supported by Python. ... print ( "wrong data types. enter numeric" ).
Read more >Documentation - Decorators - TypeScript
A Decorator is a special kind of declaration that can be attached to a class declaration, method, accessor, property, or parameter. Decorators use...
Read more >Primer on Python Decorators
Decorators provide a simple syntax for calling higher-order functions. ... in <module> TypeError: wrapper_do_twice() takes 0 positional arguments but 1 was ...
Read more >Error Handling · Goa :: Design first.
invalid_length : error produced code when the value of a payload field does not match the length validation defined in the design. Overridding...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
nvm ended up using patch-package to modify the types, in
/utils/common/makeDecorator/index.d.ts
:was this fix merged?