AuthenticateSASL with bouncer error
See original GitHub issueHi!
After migrating to .Net 5 (maybe this is not the reason) we start having error while connecting through bouncer.
If we are connecting direct to main instance AuthenticateSASL work as expected but when we are using bouncer port everything stop working at
var saslFinalServerMsg = Expect<AuthenticationSASLFinalMessage>(await ReadMessage(async), this);
with 08P01: SASL authentication failed error.
What can be reason for this behavior?
Thanks!
We have this error both at 5.0.1 and 5.0.2 while everything looks fine at 3.1.4 and 3.1.6
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:19 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Turn off SSL when connecting to bouncer
I'm getting this error when connecting to the bouncer service. ERROR: SQLSTATE[08006] [7] connection to server at "postgres-db-pg-db-pgbouncer.
Read more >Using SASL
Connecting bots which lack SASL support from SASL access only ranges can be achieved if you connect the bot via a bouncer that...
Read more >SASL authentication failure: cannot connect to saslauthd ...
I've been up searching for hours to no avail. IMAP successfully authenticates (despite dovecot being configured to piggyback off of postfix auth) ...
Read more >Error on SASL SMTP authentication
Hello Guys, iI installed a new Mailserver using Dovecot, Postfix and a MySQL-Database for the Users and Domains and Mailboxes.
Read more >Sasl
The SASL module allows you to authenticate to an IRC network via SASL. ... If you are using a ZNC bouncer provided by...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
The point being, this exact problem was fixed with version 1.12
So the reason is in incorrect ?: operator:
it should be like
Should I create pull request to fix it?