Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) in 0.9.9
See original GitHub issueI am getting this error when I am trying to save the object.
03-15 00:35:34.293 27981-27981/com.rbot.mdd.tester A/libc: Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at 0x605c500a (code=1), thread 27981 (rbot.mdd.tester)
There is no such issue in ObjectBox version 0.9.8 and 0.9.9-snapshot. Any ideas why is this happening? I will provide more information as soon as get the exact place where this error is being thrown.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:7 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Android Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at 0x636f7d89 (code=1 ...
Your application is accessing memory outside of its address space. This is most likely an invalid pointer access. SIGSEGV = segmentation fault in...
Read more >Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1, fault addr 0x20 in tid 2327
This usually indicates a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries used by your application.
Read more >SIGSEGV: Linux Segmentation Fault | Signal 11, Exit code 139
It indicates an attempt by a program to write or read outside its allocated memory—either because of a programming error, a software or...
Read more >Bug listing with status RESOLVED with resolution FIXED as at ...
Bug listing with status RESOLVED with resolution FIXED as at 2022/12/11 06:46:03 ... Bug:1313 - "mozilla-0.9.9-r1 ebuild died on me w/ Gentoo 1.0" ......
Read more >Why does Splunk Enterprise 7.1.2 crashes sporadica...
Received fatal signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Cause: No memory mapped at address [0x0000000000000010]. Crashing thread: TcpChannelThread
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
You tried wrapping around an async transaction? store.runInTxAsync()
Cannot do anything without additional info. Don’t hesitate to reopen if you gather more info.