Enhanced record validation
See original GitHub issueRefactor validation logic to be a method on each record type and to accept a flags parameter to indicate how thoroughly to validate things beyond what’s currently there.
Things like:
Ensurevalues
are unique- cname targets, mx, srv, etc. hostnames are resolvable
- maybe ip addresses are routable, pingable, http/https able… though not clear how it’d know what to try
-
CNAME
can’t coexist
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How Enhanced Validation helps you publish your research
Enhanced validation of an antibody must include primary data, preferably images, comparing side-by-side detection of the target in biological ...
Read more >(NISTIR 7804-1)Technical Evaluation, Testing, and Validation ...
This document provides the empirical rationale for critical patient safety related usability guidelines for standardization and requirements ...
Read more >Enabling Validations on Transactions - Oracle Help Center
When you modify the quantity of items in a transaction record, ... The Enhanced Validations and Defaulting SuiteApp can validate the posting and...
Read more >Technical Evaluation, Testing, and Validation of the Usability ...
This report outlines standards to enhance safety-related usability of EHRs by identifying root causes of use errors and addressing these weaknesses through ...
Read more >Enhanced validation of small-molecule ligands and ...
Small molecules (ligands and carbohydrates) appearing in PDB structures have been prioritized for enhanced validation.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
https://github.com/github/octodns/issues/63 I think is related to making log messages more clear.
There could definitely be a bit more descriptive errors, in-depth knowledge of DNS is needed to understand sometimes what went wrong, whether it be on the OctoDNS side or something that’s happening because of behavior in a provider.
Thanks for the feedback!
I just ran into this:
cnames
cannot point to itself.A DNS provider happily allowed us to create this condition via the web ux, however, route53 and dyn rejected it upon attempting to create the entries via octodns with the
--doit
flag.