Persistent cache/ in successive CI builds?
See original GitHub issueI have noticed that in every CI build, for example this, there are a lot of:
[x] GET: https://X.Y/Z
[x] 200 OK
calls which probably take up the majority of the build time. Is it not possible to persist the cache/ directory across successive CI builds (so redundant GET calls are avoided)?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Caching in GitLab CI/CD
A cache is one or more files a job downloads and saves. Subsequent jobs that use the same cache don't have to download...
Read more >Persisting Data Overview
Caching persists data between the same job in different builds, allowing you to reuse the data from expensive fetch operations from previous jobs....
Read more >Webpack 5 persistent cache is not usable in CI environments
In CI, a common paradigm is to store cachable data between runs to cut down on execution time. The webpack 5 persistent cache...
Read more >Caching Dependencies and Directories - Travis CI
Caches lets Travis CI store directories between builds, which is useful for storing dependencies that take longer to compile or download. Note that...
Read more >Persistent cache - Dagger Documentation
However, sometimes you can't keep a persistent Buildkit daemon along your CI/CD. For instance, if you use a GitHub Actions runner, your daemon...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

One of the advantages of online-judge-verify-helper is the “bundle” feature. We would like to write our libraries with multiple files, but most judge services require single
.cppfiles to submit. The “bundle” feature solves this problem. It converts.cppfiles and#include-ed many.hppfiles into the single.cppfile.Hi, thanks for your helpful responses! I will look into the other repo you linked to. Does it have any other significant advantage over oj-tool apart from generating awesome documentation like this one?