BatchNorm in OP_SET version 7 has no mode attribute
See original GitHub issueThe BatchNormalization operator does not have mode attribute, so how do we figure out the difference between ‘training’ and ‘testing’ mode.
The OP_SET version 6 of the operator had a is_test attribute.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:17 (17 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
8.5. Batch Normalization - Dive into Deep Learning
Like a dropout layer, batch normalization layers have different behaviors in training mode and prediction mode. Batch normalization is useful for regularization ...
Read more >The Effect of Batch Normalization on Deep Convolutional ...
Our experiments show that batch normalization indeed has positive effects on many aspects of neural networks but we cannot confirm significant convergence ...
Read more >tf.compat.v1.layers.batch_normalization | TensorFlow v2.11.0
When virtual_batch_size is not None , instead perform "Ghost Batch Normalization", which creates virtual sub-batches which are each normalized ...
Read more >How to Train Your ResNet 7: Batch Norm - Myrtle.ai
Things have not gone to plan (!) – there have been ample opportunities for optimisation, but batch norm has remained stubbornly in place....
Read more >API Reference :: NVIDIA Deep Learning cuDNN Documentation
The function does not support the provided configuration. CUDNN_STATUS_BAD_PARAM. At least one of the following conditions are met: The parameter mode has an ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found

@ebarsoum it seems like the assumption that we are always in inference mode goes directly contradictory to a default momentum value of 0.9. In inference mode, momentum is effectively 1.0. How should we reconcile these contradictory default values?
Closing this issue since BatchNorm has been updated now to include the training mode : https://github.com/onnx/onnx/blob/master/docs/Operators.md#BatchNormalization