Why do not provide the Runner Constructor
See original GitHub issueThere are OptimizerConstructor
…, but why not provide a runner constructor?
It would be more general and flexible to implement some functions.
Looking forward it.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:9 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
JUnit custom runner not working? - Stack Overflow
Your class has no constructor with that signature. Its only constructor has parameters Class<?> type , List<Object[]> parameterList and int i .
Read more >TypeError: "x" is not a constructor - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs
The JavaScript exception "is not a constructor" occurs when there was an attempt to use an object or a variable as a constructor,...
Read more >BlockJUnit4ClassRunner (JUnit API)
Returns a new fixture for running a test. Default implementation executes the test class's no-argument constructor (validation should have ensured one exists).
Read more >[Runner VM Bug] behavior of `{}.constructor === Object` does ...
Rationale for fixing bug. I came across this bug while attempting to use the React Material UI library, @mui/material .
Read more >Class Constructor Methods - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
MATLAB ® classes that do not explicitly define any class constructors have a default constructor method. This method returns an object of the...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@ZwwWayne , please have a look
@ZwwWayne @zhouzaida Thanks for your replies. And I will create a PR as soon as possible and also make sure that minor modification is needed.