gn result is worse than bn on pascal voc
See original GitHub issueI train Faster-rcnn:R-50-FPN use bn and gn on voc 07+12, but the gn result (AP 0.5:0.95) is worse than bn, both batch size=2, 1 gpu
Backbone | AP | AP50 | AP75 |
---|---|---|---|
Faster-rcnn:R-50-FPN(bn) |
0.501 | 0.785 | 0.542 |
Faster-rcnn:R-50-FPN(gn) |
0.474 | 0.790 | 0.498 |
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:18 (17 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
arXiv:1911.09738v1 [cs.CV] 21 Nov 2019
In this paper, we study normalization methods for neu- ral networks from the perspective of elimination singu- larity.
Read more >The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Homepage
The PASCAL VOC project: Provides standardised image data sets for object class recognition; Provides a common set of tools for accessing the data...
Read more >Rethinking Normalization and Elimination Singularity in ...
These findings provide a new way of understanding why GN is performing better than LN, and how WS improves the performances of both...
Read more >Universal Bounding Box Regression and Its Applications
est objects, and the results are bounding boxes clustered around true object ... where bn is an input box and gn is the...
Read more >Batch Group Normalization | DeepAI
Furthermore, as shown in our experiments, BN's performance saturates at extreme large batch sizes, i.e., 128 images per worker. GN enjoys a ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
yes, I read the gn paper again, maybe you are right thanks for your patient reply !!