How come when I sample a 64x64 unconditional model off the shelf, I get only noise?
See original GitHub issuepython scripts/image_sample.py --model_path /path/to/model.pt $MODEL_FLAGS $DIFFUSION_FLAGS
How come when I run this combination the sampled images are just static noises? I get that the model is unconditional, is that why? Or am I doing something wrong
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:15
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Avoid the Dreaded Phase Clicks in Your Samples
http://busyworksbeats.com/ sample Click Here for the FREE Sample Tutorial Series.
Read more >A Fast ODE Solver for Diffusion Probabilistic Model Sampling ...
We propose a fast ODE solver for sampling from diffusion probabilistic models in around 10 steps.
Read more >Instance-Conditioned GAN - DeepAI
(b) Conditioned on instance features hi and noise z, the generator produces a synthetic sample xg. Generated samples and real samples (neighbors ...
Read more >Antonio Torralba | Papers With Code
In this work, we revisit the global average pooling layer proposed in [13], and shed light on how it explicitly enables the convolutional...
Read more >Synthetic 1024×1024 faces, sampled from an unconditional ...
We present SR3, an approach to image Super-Resolution via Repeated Refinement. SR3 adapts denoising diffusion probabilistic models [1], ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I encountered the same problem when training on a custom dataset (cats). To be specific, the model only produces static noise on 4000 steps. However, after another 4000 steps, it can actually produce blurred cats. So I believe more training steps may work.