Illegal reflective access by feign.DefaultMethodHandler in Java 11
See original GitHub issueSimilar to #393
This can be reproduced on Java 11 (probably also 9 and 10) with the Github example after renaming the package to notfeign.example.github
(or anything that isn’t under feign.*
). Can be compiled with Java 8 or 11 (the compiler doesn’t complain either way).
I reproduced on Zulu and Corretto 11.0.2 (all OpenJDK 11 implementations should behave the same):
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu11.29+3-CA (build 11.0.2+7-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu11.29+3-CA (build 11.0.2+7-LTS, mixed mode)
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-11.0.2.9.1 (build 11.0.2+9-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-11.0.2.9.1 (build 11.0.2+9-LTS, mixed mode)
$ java -jar target/feign-example-github-10.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by feign.DefaultMethodHandler (file:/Users/gavin/test/feign/example-github/target/feign-example-github-10.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar) to field java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup.IMPL_LOOKUP
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of feign.DefaultMethodHandler
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
Let's fetch and print a list of the contributors to this org.
[GitHub#repos] ---> GET https://api.github.com/users/openfeign/repos?sort=full_name HTTP/1.1
[GitHub#repos] <--- HTTP/1.1 200 OK (554ms)
...
Note that using the --illegal-access=warn
JVM option just changes the warning to just the single line calling out feign.DefaultMethodHandler
.
It seems like fixing this while maintaining compatibility for older Java versions will not be fun. Refs:
https://mydailyjava.blogspot.com/2018/04/jdk-11-and-proxies-in-world-past.html
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:20 (13 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What is an illegal reflective access? - java - Stack Overflow
Apart from an understanding of the accesses amongst modules and their respective packages. I believe the crux of it lies in the Module ......
Read more >OpenFeign/feign - Gitter
I'm trying to convert my spring boot project from java 8 to java 11, but I get this WARNING: WARNING: An illegal reflective...
Read more >An illegal reflective access operation has occurred when ...
An illegal reflective access operation has occurred when using Java 11 with ForgeRock products. Last updated Aug 18, 2022.
Read more >Java 9 Illegal Reflective Access Warning - Baeldung
Before Java 9, the Java Reflection API has a superpower: It could gain access to the non-public class members without limitation.
Read more >Guide to Java Versions and Features - DZone
Java 8, Java 11, Java 13 — what's the difference? ... build tools print out "reflective access"-warnings when building Java projects, ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Just a note, wiht JDK 16 release, that will be in March this won’t be a warning but an error (so it will break the app, unless one adds a workaround).
Another note, JEP 403 was announced recently as a candidate. Whenever it lands (which might even be JDK 17 at this point),
--illegal-access=deny
will be the default and all attempts to relax it will be ignored.--add-opens
should still be supported, at least for now.