[admin] Show readonly id of organization
See original GitHub issueReserved for GCI
In order to authenticate with the API, you need to know the organization’s id and it’s token. The token is displayed, but the org id however, is not. Create a read-only field in OrganizationAdmin
that displays the org’s id.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:19 (19 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Readonly models in Django admin interface? - Stack Overflow
I'm not looking to create a readonly user: every user should be readonly. django · django-admin · readonly · Share.
Read more >About read-only administrators - Okta Documentation
Read-only administrators. Read-only admins have view access to most data in the Admin Console. Like report admins, read-only admins are unable to edit...
Read more >About admin roles in the Microsoft 365 admin center
Each admin role maps to common business functions and gives people in your organization permissions to do specific tasks in the admin centers....
Read more >Managing access permissions for your AWS organization
The management account administrator creates an IAM role and attaches a permissions policy to the role that grants permissions to the organization's resources....
Read more >The Django admin site
The admin's recommended use is limited to an organization's internal ... contain values defined in ModelAdmin.readonly_fields to be displayed as read-only.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hey guys, I think it may be better to do this change directly in
openwisp-users
. It would be easier and it’s acceptable because I’m sure other modules will need a similar thing in the future, so let’s make it there directly.@R9295 @atb00ker do you see any problem with that?
PS: we may have a chance to try the new github feature to move an issue to a different repo 😊
@nemesisdesign, just added it