Method not working in select expressions
See original GitHub issueHi , I have a serious problem with 2.1.9 .
I guess there is a sql parsing bug in this release, that returns some missing in functionalities
for example :
select '1'.asLong() + 1 as newID from E
returns nothing in GratefulDeadConcerts DB .
or when i working on Link .include() method nothing returns .
is there any idea ?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Comments:16 (16 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Select method is not called using LinQ query syntax
Select method is not called using LinQ query syntax ; var query = · where ; static void Main(string[] args) { var query...
Read more >eval() - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs - Mozilla
The eval() function evaluates JavaScript code represented as a string and returns its completion value. The source is parsed as a script.
Read more >Building a query expression—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop
Query expressions are used in ArcGIS to select a subset of features and table records. Query expressions in ArcGIS adhere to standard SQL...
Read more >Using expressions in your forms: a reference for all operators ...
How to construct expressions for your calculations, constraints, and relevance conditions, including a complete list of all operators and functions ...
Read more >The Go Programming Language Specification
The following keywords are reserved and may not be used as identifiers. break default func interface select case defer go map struct chan ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi @saeedtabrizi
I just pushed a fix for the method invocation issue. Now the following works fine:
The fix will be available in next 2.2.1
Thanks
Luigi
Yes. This is where I believe going “no sql” or rather schemaless wins out. If you you leave the schema at application level, you shouldn’t need to worry about schema at the database level. I know there are also pros and cons to this, but it is how we are planning to make the database per tenant infrastructure work. Also, our “core” system will have very little in the form of its own schema. The rest will be customer defined schema, and also a reason why we need the separation.
Scott