Beales re opening
See original GitHub issueBeales/beales-b626d5
has been re opening. The original company folded under debt, a new company now owns the brand and is opening stores. src
I’m not sure how Wikidata should be updated, should Q4876141 be about a defunct company, or updated to reflect the brands new ownership?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Hundreds of shoppers queue for reopening of Beales in ... - ITV
A well-known department store has opened its doors again in Southport. Beales on Lord Street closed in March of last year after the...
Read more >Huge Merseyside department store Beales finally reopens today
People are being invited to shop local at Beales, which opens on Lord Street in Southport at 9.30am today, Thursday, August 12. The...
Read more >VIDEO: Beales Re-Opening at The Dolphin Shopping Centre
Established in Bournemouth in 1881, Beales plays host to some of the most popular labels and cosmetic brands. 110 Dolphin Centre, Poole, Dorset, ......
Read more >More Beales stores could reopen after company revives a ...
THE new owners of Beales are opening a second department store and have an eye on two more. New Start 2020 bought the...
Read more >Beales set to reopen Southport store - Drapers
The new owner of Beales will reopen its 38,000 sq ft store in Southport, Merseyside, on 12 August. By Isabella Fish 21 July...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
OK, looks like someone (you?) added another start date to it, I’ve just added the new Companies House number. Still not sure it’s tagged right as Wikidata is not something I’ve done a deep dive into, but I’m sure it’ll sort itself out.
I guess the next thing is to take it off the NSI dissolved list, so it can get back into editors.
ok I ended up doing both of those things to Beales Q4876141, but our script still added it to the dissolved.json , sort of:
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/99070f7a8adb96f15966c9a82c13b824e8dff452/dist/dissolved.json#L49-L51
So it looks like I need to edit the script to specifically ignore “novalue” P576 claims.