Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
'packit build' should start all builds at once
See original GitHub issueKoji builds started by packit build could be started in parallel and watched till completion (except when --nowait is provided, of course).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:16 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Running tests with builds from another PR - Packit
Once you open a pull request with some changes, tests are going to run as usual with all dependencies being installed based on...
Read more >Add support to build again only failed builds #540 - GitHub
So to make it clear, we want to have support for /packit rebuild-failed comment that will retrigger the failed builds. From the code...
Read more >How to set up Packit to simplify upstream project integration
Let's start with a simple example. You need to determine if the new code changes in GitHub or GitLab project built on all...
Read more >Packit - packaging in Fedora with minimal effort
Packit also provides a way to build an SRPM package based on an upstream repository checkout, which can be used for building RPM...
Read more >Create a Paketo Buildpack
To start a brand new Go project all you need to do is create a new directory to ... package node import (...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I will appreciate this 💙
I was just about to open a ticket for this feature. It still sounds like a reasonable and useful idea to me.
Could you please consider reopening this?